California charter school worker reports abuse, loses job

A former Inglewood, California, school administrator claims that she was fired after filing a suspected child abuse report with the county’s Department of Children and Family Services. In addition, she claims in a wrongful termination lawsuit that she was fired in retaliation for reporting that the charter school was not following state mandates regarding special education.

According to the lawsuit, the woman started working as the dean of students at the Inglewood, California, charter school in August 2010.

Four months into her job, a parent expressed concern regarding a male teacher who had touched several of the female student’s faces, and even went as far as to stick his fingers in their mouths. After hearing this accusation, the administrator followed the law and reported all of the information to the Department of Children and Family Services.

However, it did not end there, and just two months later another parent came with concerns regarding the same male teacher. This time the teacher had reportedly bought a female student a laptop as a gift. The girl’s father did not think this type of gift from a teacher was appropriate, and according to the wrongful termination lawsuit, the father viewed this behavior as that of a “sexual predator.”

After the laptop incident, an attorney for the school allegedly advised that the teacher should be fired from the charter school. But, the administrator claims her supervisors wanted her to stop investigating the matter, and even told her to apologize to the teacher.

On top of the issues regarding the teacher, the administrator also presented information to a planning agency showing that the school’s special education programming was ineffective and not up to state standards.

Less than a year after getting hired as the dean of students, the woman was fired. Her performance evaluations showed that she was doing fine at her job, until she started to look into the allegations regarding the male teacher.

She is now seeking an unspecified amount in damages from the school for her termination.

Source: Pasadena Star News, “Former Inglewood charter school worker sues over firing,” Feb. 9, 2012

Article source: http://www.employmentattorneysanjose.com/2012/02/california-charter-school-worker-reports-abuse-loses-job.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

10 Term Congressman Accused of Sexual Harassment

A House Ethics Committee investigation will look in to the merit of the claims by a Helsinki Commission staff member that Congressman Hastings doled out unwanted hugs and made sexually suggestive comments. The complaints date back to 2007, when the staffer was originally hired.

The alleged victim said that work trips included unwanted sexual advances on several occasions, including one incident in Portugal when the congressman started to rant about his interest in her.

The Congressman denies all of the allegations, and as said that he believes the victim is using this complaint to promote her upcoming book. “The acts alleged are contrary to my character and to the main objective of my career in Congress, advancing the civil rights of all people,” he said in a statement.

Workplace sexual harassment is illegal and can consist of many types of unwanted behavior by a coworker, boss, employee, or any agent of the employer. The victim can be a man or a woman, and does not have to be the opposite sex of the harasser. Even if the victim doesn’t suffer from an economic harm or lose their job, there can still be damage and possible recovery.

In Louisiana, sexual harassment includes uninvited sexual advances, improper sexual innuendo, requests for sexual favors, inappropriate touching, or sexually explicit remarks. Sexual harassment can also be any other behavior that has a sexual nature and intimidates, offends or interferes with your ability to work. If you think you may be a victim of sexual harassment, the advice and counsel of an experienced attorney can help you understand your options and possible ways to end the harassment.

Source: Reuters, “Report details harassment claim against Congressman Hastings,” Alex Dobuzinskis, Jan. 11, 2012

Article source: http://www.neworleansemploymentlawyer.com/2012/02/10-term-congressman-accused-of-sexual-harassment.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

EEOC files religious discrimination suit against electric company

In California and in other states, it is illegal to discriminate against employees. When employees believe they have been discriminated against because of their religion or other factors, employees may take legal action to ensure that their employers comply with important state and federal laws.

Last month, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a religious discrimination lawsuit against an electric company because it fired an employee who in advance requested a day off to attend a religious convention. The employee was a customer service representative and a Jehovah’s Witness.

A representative for the EEOC stated that the employee’s request was minor, so the EEOC was amazed that the electric company not only denied the employee’s request for one day off, but that the company also took action to fire the woman for making the request. “Employees should never be forced to choose between their religion and their job,” commented a director for the EEOC.

The federal law that the electric company allegedly violated is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The act states that an employer cannot fire an employee based on religion and that an employer must make reasonable accommodations for employees to their religious beliefs, if those beliefs are sincere. Before filing the lawsuit, the EEOC attempted to reach a pre-litigation agreement with the electric company.

In the lawsuit, the EEOC requested that the court grant a permanent injunction against the electric company. The injunction states that the electric company cannot discriminate and fire employees because of religious beliefs. The lawsuit also requests that the court order the electric company to pay punitive and compensatory damages to the woman who was wrongfully terminated, along with any additional compensation for damages that the court deems fair and reasonable.

Source: jobmouse, “Power Supplier Fired Jehovah’s Witness For Wanting One Day Off To Attend Religious Convention,” Anneline Waldman, Jan. 27, 2012

Article source: http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2012/02/eeoc-files-religious-discrimination-suit-against-electric-company.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

Models band together to fight industry-wide sexual harassment

Given that California is arguably the fashion and entertainment center of the U.S., most people know someone who is or wanted at some point to be a model. Modeling is perceived as one of the most glamorous professions there is. All models make hundreds of thousands of dollars, get to wear beautiful clothes and generally live a cosmopolitan existence, right?

Maybe not.

Most professional models make very little money (“There’s only one Gisele,” one note drily), work grueling schedules and never become a household name. Unfortunately, it also seems that sexual harassment is rife in the industry. Models often worry that if they complain about how they are treated, they will be fired and replaced by any number of aspiring models who would be happy to take their place. Also, many models are very young women who have no support system because they are so far from home, so they are easy to take advantage of.

The founder of the group, The Model Alliance, is a model herself. Although she has now achieved quite a bit of success in her career, she was discovered when she was 14 and compared entering the world of modeling to being thrown into a precarious field of employment.

The Model Alliance first step at fighting sexual harassment was set up a system for model to anonymously report alleged sexual harassment during New York Fashion Week, which starts this week. The founder is working on so-called Model’s Bill of Rights.

It will be interesting to see whether The Model Alliance succeeds. A similar group was founded in 1995, but if sputtered out because not enough models participated. In any event, hopefully the modeling industry can pull together behind this effort, because no one deserves to be subjected to sexual harassment.

Source: The San Francisco Chronicle, “Fashion models organize to fend off abuses,” Leann Italie, Feb. 8, 2012

Article source: http://www.sanfrancisco-employment-lawyer.com/2012/02/models-band-together-to-fight-industry-wide-sexual-harassment.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

When is a work environment considered to be hostile in California?

When workers in San Diego and throughout the entire state of California file lawsuits against employers for sexual harassment, they will sometimes cite that their work environments became too “hostile” for them to handle. Although any work setting where sexual harassment has occurred may be thought of as hostile, conditions in the office must meet specific requirements before employees can claim that their work environments are hostile.

According to the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), isolated and even occasional acts of harassment do not always constitute a hostile work environment. However, harassment in any form is still illegal and complaints should be properly filed by employees in order to make sure that their rights are protected and that the harassment stops.

When an employee claims that an environment has become hostile under FEHA, the employee must be able to provide sufficient evidence of the harassment being severe enough to change the conditions in the office and to affect one’s ability to do his or her job. Additionally, if employees claim that harassment against other workers affected their own ability to work, the employees must provide sufficient evidence that they witnessed the harassment in person.

In a case recently decided by the California Court of Appeals, the court overturned a previous decision by a jury that ruled in favor of a woman who claimed that her work environment became hostile. The woman reported that between 2000 and 2003, she had attended three off-site work parties with employees that involved sexually offensive conduct. In 2004, she received an email by mistake that was written by an executive at her company. The email referred to the woman as “big-titted” and “mindless.”

In 2005, the employee quit and sued her former employer for sexual harassment and for creating a hostile work environment. A jury initially awarded the woman $250,000 in damages, but an appeals court judge overturned the jury’s decision citing that there was no evidence that the woman was ever assaulted, subjected to unwanted advances, threatened, propositioned or subjected to explicit language or verbal abuse.

The court agreed that that the email about the woman

Article source: http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2012/02/when-is-a-work-environment-considered-to-be-hostile-in-california.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

California laboratory accused of age discrimination

The first five plaintiffs, out of a total 130, are going to be in court later this month to argue that California-based Lawrence Livermore Laboratory purposely got rid of older employers during a massive lay-off.

The age discrimination case against the laboratory, which used to be managed by the University of California, goes back to 2008 when San Francisco-based Bechtel Corp. took over managing the lab. Shortly after this change in hands, 440 employees were laid off. At the time, they were told the decision was due to a $280 million budget shortfall.

However, the claim is that the laboratory purposely misrepresented the amount of this budget shortfall in order to justify laying-off older employees. These employees were ones with higher salaries, and who were closer to retirements and pensions. Their medical costs were also reportedly more costly.

Since the wrongful termination lawsuit was filed, at least one of the employees has come out and talked about the humiliation and shame she was forced to endure the day of the lay-off. Before the lay-off she had worked at the laboratory for 38 years. However, none of that seemed to matter as she was given just one hour to collect her belongs and leave. The entire time — even when using the bathroom — she was followed by a security guard.

“I felt like a criminal. The only thing missing were the handcuffs,” she said about the ordeal.

Sadly, age discrimination is not unheard of. Sometimes it happens in the hiring process, while other times it is seen in decisions regarding who to lay-off. Fortunately, the law is on the side of the employee when it comes to age discrimination. Because of this, if you were recently fired or laid-off from a job, and you believe age had something to do with the decision, talk with an attorney who focuses on discrimination in the workplace to see if you could have a case against your former employer.

Source: East Bay Express, “Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s Wrongful-Termination Lawsuit Moves Closer to Court,” John Geluardi, Jan. 30, 2012

Article source: http://www.employmentattorneysanjose.com/2012/02/california-laboratory-accused-of-age-discrimination.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

Archie Comics embroiled in sexual harassment scandal

When most people think about sexual harassment, they picture a male supervisor who makes unwanted advances or comments toward female employees. However, it is important to understand that men can also be victims.

One such sexual harassment case is putting the future of Archie Comics in jeopardy.

The company’s co-CEO, Nancy Silberkleit, is accused of creating a hostile work environment for the company’s male employees. Among the numerous allegations are claims that Silberkleit would burst into meetings and shout remarks about her male employees’ genitalia.

The lawsuit against Silberkleit was brought by the other co-CEO, Jonathan Goldwater. After Silberkleit violated rules limiting her interactions with employees, Goldwater went to court to have her banned from the company’s office until the charges are resolved.

Silberkleit denies the harassment allegations, but does admit that she was under a lot of stress as a result of being one of the few females in a male-dominated industry. She thinks the lawsuit is part of an attempt to force her out of the company that has been in her family since its founding.

The dispute is making many in the industry wonder if Archie Comics will be able to maintain its status as the last of the independently-owned major comic book companies. Goldwater wants to sell the company, but Silberkleit refuses. However, if she loses the lawsuit, she may no longer have a choice.

Only time will tell whether the allegations against Silberkleit are true or not. However, one thing is certain: perceived sexual harassment creates an unstable work environment and puts companies at risk.

Source: The Daily Beast, “Archie Comics: Corporate Brawl Over Sexual Harassment Charges,” Nancy Hass, Feb. 1, 2012

Article source: http://www.sanfrancisco-employment-lawyer.com/2012/02/archie-comics-embroiled-in-sexual-harassment-scandal.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

Woman reports harassment; informed her $98K job no longer exists

When a person reports sexual harassment to his or her employer, it is the employer’s responsibility to address the situation appropriately. Responding “appropriately” could include reviewing the sexual harassment policy with the alleged harasser or taking disciplinary action him or her.

A sexual harassment complaint should never be resolved by firing the person who reported the harassment. Retaliation is illegal in California and every other state. Unfortunately that doesn’t stop companies from firing employees if the company is worried the employee’s honesty could tarnish the company’s reputation. And that is exactly what happened to a rising star in one corporation.

Stephanie was a rising star at a corporate real estate institute. She was having dinner with her boss when she asked about her pending promotion. According to the lawsuit, “He grabbed her hand…without her consent, he forcibly placed her hand on his crotch and his erect penis.”

Stephanie told her boss that “she was not that kind of girl,” and she reported the incident. Shortly after reporting the matter, her boss resigned “for health reasons.” Then, Stephanie was informed her $98,000-a year position no longer existed, and there was no specific job in which she could be placed.

When the company’s vice president was contacted, he denied that Stephanie was fired for reporting sexual harassment. Moreover, he insisted that Stephanie “continues to have a job and we have urged her to return to work,” though she has not been in since September.

It’s impossible to know exactly what happened in the weeks following Stephanie’s sexual harassment accusations. Hopefully justice will be brought to the situation with the lawsuit.

Source: NYDailyNews, “Harassed then NYU job vanished, she says,” Barbara Ross, Jan. 25, 2012

Article source: http://www.sanfrancisco-employment-lawyer.com/2012/02/woman-reports-harassment-informed-her-98k-job-no-longer-exists.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

Racial Discrimination Alleged in School District Suit

Three employees are accusing a school district of systemic discrimination against African Americans. The suit claims that administrators used racial slurs, deprived the employees of opportunities, retaliated against them and their families, and tried to remove them from their jobs. The complaint, filed in U.S. District Court, lists four defendants including a school principal and the district superintendent.

The complaint alleges that the administrators conspired to deny the employees with additional training and professional development opportunities that were being offered to other teachers. One of the teachers says he was even denied proper classroom equipment in some instances. Another teacher claims that his two children were removed from normal classes for several months in retaliation for their father’s complaints against the district.

The complaint states that a former assistant principal was routinely addressed using a racial slur and reminded of her race and gender by her boss. Ironically, her boss (one of the defendants) is also African American, but told the assistant principal that he didn’t want to show favoritism and was intentionally denying her positive opportunities.

At one point in 2011, public protests erupted at a school board meeting. Shortly after that, one of the teachers was fired despite having no involvement in the demonstration.

The Superintendent, who is also a defendant, issued a statement saying that the claims are meritless.

Employment discrimination is defined as being denied employment opportunities or promotions or being fired based on a disability, race or national origin, gender, age, religion or pregnancy. This is an unlawful practice and should not be tolerated. Sometimes employers may retaliate against an employee who complains or voices a concern, this is also unlawful. The advice of a lawyer can be valuable in these situations, especially if someone would like to keep their current job but end the discriminatory conditions.

Source: Malverne-Westhempstead Patch, “Malverne School District Sued for Racial Discrimination,” Tara Conry, Dec. 12, 2012

Article source: http://www.neworleansemploymentlawyer.com/2012/02/racial-discrimination-alleged-in-school-district-suit.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off

Racial discrimination and retaliation major problems in workplace

Discrimination in the workplace and wrongful termination appear to be widespread problems in California and throughout the entire country. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), complaints from workers were up during 2011 for a second year in row with the majority of the charges against employers alleging racial discrimination and retaliation in the workplace.

The annual report was released by the EEOC last month. Although employees are protected by many state and federal laws, the results of the report suggest that more needs to be done to enforce these rights and that employers need to take a greater responsibility in making sure that the rights of employees are being protected.

According to the annual report, the EEOC received more than 99,900 complaints from U.S. workers. The agency helps to defend the rights of workers when employers violate the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.

During the 2011 fiscal year, the agency reported that it received complaints from workers for the first time alleging violations of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. This law prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on their families’ medical histories or their genetic information. More than 240 complaints in this category were reported and have not yet been resolved.

Retaliation by employers against workers accounted for the majority of the complaints filed by workers with the EEOC. These charges totaled 37,334 during 2011. More than 35,000 complaints involved race discrimination, more than 28,000 complaints involved sex discrimination and more 25,000 complaints involved disability discrimination.

Despite the record number of charges filed with the EEOC, the agency reported that it was able to close more than 112,000 pending complaints during 2011. Private, state and local employees who won their cases recovered more than $455 million in relief during the 2011 fiscal year. Federal employees who resolved their cases received more than $58 million in relief.

Source: Kansas City Star, “EEOC receives record job discrimination complaints in 2011,” Diane Stafford, Jan. 25, 2012

Article source: http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2012/02/racial-discrimination-and-retaliation-major-problems-in-workplace.shtml

Posted in Wrongful Dismissal | Tagged | Comments Off